Risk Management
Understanding and mitigating protocol risks
Overview
Every investment carries risk. Manifest's approach to risk management focuses on transparency, mitigation strategies, and clear communication about potential challenges. Understanding these risks helps users make informed decisions about their participation in the protocol.
Market Risks
Home Price Volatility
While U.S. residential real estate has appreciated over long time horizons, short-term volatility exists. Regional downturns, economic recessions, interest rate changes, or changes in monetary policy can affect home values.
Manifest's design aims to faithfully represent HPA in the price of $USH. Users for whom this exposure is undesirable are not well-suited to hold $USH.
Operational Risks
HEI Origination Quality
The protocol currently relies on a single origination partner to source and underwrite HEIs, with plans to expand to multiple partners. Partner underwriting quality directly affects portfolio performance.
Safeguards in place:
Strict underwriting guidelines and buy-box parameters
Right to reject non-conforming HEIs
Right to regular audits of partner operations
Active expansion to additional origination partners
Liquidity Management
The core challenge: HEIs average 4.5-year periods until they settle while tokens can be sold instantly. Extreme redemption pressure could force suboptimal asset sales.
Comprehensive approach:
Duration matching: $sUSH staking incentives create time-locked positions
High IOL targets: Incentivizing investor-owned liquidity ensures deep markets
Institutional relationships: Established buyers exist for HEI portfolios if asset liquidation is needed
Securitization access: Ability to sell HEIs into institutional markets
POL buffer: Protocol-owned liquidity provides immediate redemption capacity
Valuation Accuracy
The protocol depends on accurate daily valuations of the HEI portfolio to set NAV.
Quality controls:
Conservative valuation methodologies and assumptions
Transparent calculation methods
Third-party home valuation estimates from bank-grade automated valuation models
Smart Contract Risks
Technical Vulnerabilities
Like all DeFi protocols, smart contract bugs could potentially affect operations or user funds.
Security measures:
Professional audits before deployment
Gradual rollout with increasing TVL limits
Emergency pause functionality
Legal and Regulatory Risks
Regulatory Evolution
The regulatory landscape for tokenized real assets continues evolving. New regulations could affect protocol operations or token tradability.
Compliance approach:
Proactive engagement with counsel
Structure designed for regulatory flexibility
Conservative interpretation of existing rules
Tax Law Changes
Changes to tax treatment of HEIs, token transactions, or international structures could affect returns.
Structural advantages:
Ongoing tax advisory relationships
Established precedents in each jurisdiction
Ability to adapt structure as needed
Concentration Risks
Geographic Concentration
Initial operations focus on 14 states where our origination partner operates. Regional economic issues could disproportionately affect the portfolio.
Expansion plans:
Targeting all 50 states over time
Adding origination partners in new regions
Monitoring regional exposure limits
Prioritizing geographic diversity in acquisitions
Counterparty Dependencies
The protocol depends on several key counterparties:
HEI origination partner (expanding to multiple)
Banking and custody providers
Legal and tax advisors
Technical service providers (Villcaso Corporation)
Mitigation strategies:
Clear service agreements with termination rights
Documented processes for provider transitions
Regular performance monitoring
Expansion to multiple providers where feasible
Protocol-Specific Risks
Governance Risks
$USA holders can influence protocol direction through governance votes. Poor governance decisions could harm protocol value.
Governance safeguards:
Limited initial governance scope
Professional directors provide oversight
All governance votes give permission, not direction to the professional management of Manifest
Yield Sustainability
Staking yields depend on the gap between HEI returns and NAV growth. This gap could narrow if home appreciation accelerates or HEI returns compress.
Sustainability factors:
Structural advantages of HEIs remain constant
Governance can adjust reward distribution
Natural supply/demand balance for staking
Risk Monitoring
Real-Time Dashboards
The protocol maintains transparent monitoring of:
Portfolio geographic distribution
Liquidity depth and utilization
Staking ratios
User Considerations
Investment Suitability
$USH suits users who:
Seek real asset exposure
Understand real estate market cycles
Can tolerate moderate price volatility
Have appropriate risk capacity
Risk Management Tools
Users can manage their own risk through:
Diversification across multiple assets
Staking for additional yield cushion
Providing liquidity for additional rewards
Monitoring NAV versus market price
Emergency Procedures
Protocol Response Plans
For various risk scenarios:
Liquidity Crisis: Activate emergency redemption mechanisms, potentially sell HEI portfolios
Smart Contract Exploit: Pause affected functions, coordinate recovery efforts
Regulatory Action: Adjust operations to comply, potentially limit certain jurisdictions
Market Crash: Continue normal operations, communicate transparently about NAV impacts
Last updated